原帖由
joey 於 2009-4-14 01:55 PM 發表
明白你既解釋
當年ducati當然唔同依家今時今日咁對stoner咁好喇
正正果時capirossi同佢之間既分別(比同近年隊友既分別)細d , 又可以引証車隊偏重車手多少對其成績既分別....
(當年新仔又邊會就晒佢呢)
...
所以陰謀論咪永遠都咁有市場囉!!!
你已點出最主要一點 : 是車手要有能力發拙出賽車的真正內在潛質, 例如羅斯, 就是最佳例子, 但並不是躍馬同佢度身訂造呀!!! 冇這回事架!!
每當有新的研發, 新的設計, 未實地測試是紙上談兵, 你估工程師/設計師唔知是理論上的事咩? 科技永遠向前發展, 工程師/設計師永遠向未知數探索, 跟住新作品就要靠車手去落場測試才可驗證是否如想像般的效果.
這個環節就好考車手的試車的能力. 好多車手, 可以駕駛得出神入化, 好快, 但問番佢架賽車有甚麼 behaviour 呢, 好多專業車手答唔出!!!
請攪清楚, 這與經驗關係不大, 是天份!
出色的試車手好多時速度不怎麼特別, 但就每能準確地, 老實地描述出賽車行為的細節, 工程師對此如獲至寶. 點解要強調老實呢?! 今時今日, 好多車手為掩飾他揸唔出, 或感覺唔出分別 ( 話知佢好快好快) 會扮分得出, 老作!!!
所以工程師/設計師係好重視有反映車架能力的車手的 feed back, 但跟住番番辦公室再用這實地測試左, 認為可靠的資料再利用來研發他認為對的方向, 或以此來修正他之前以為會快左但 "經試車證實" 不確的設計....... 但並非用來為某某度身訂造呀!!!!!
你又知唔知一架賽車要幾多工程師/設計師來合作呢???? 一, 兩個??? 成班人架, 淨係佢地班 "師s" 都有排攪融合意見啦!
再引述死鬼冼拿的一句半句, 好讓大家知道, 試車, 何等重要, 何等考工夫!! :-
A driver has to tell his team of technicians about the car's reactions, so he needs a certain amount of sensitivity, but he must also be able to interpret and explain, its behaviour, so as to give a clear and concise account.
.....a classic mistake is to confuse cause and effect. A typical case is when oversteer at the exit is caused by understeer at the entry. If the driver does not recognise this link he will want the oversteer corrected while instead the problem is the understeer. Because the car slides away at he front end, the driver thinks he is not steering enough and increases the lock to counteract the understeer. When he has reached the steering limit, which is reached quite quickly, by turning the wheel further the driver will have the opposite effect : OVERSTEER. This is because he has braked the rear end of the car with the front wheels. At this stage the game is up and the car will slide out of the bend on its rear tyres.
From this it is obvious that a good driver, and a good test driver, is one who is conscious of what he is doing and, above all, has total confidence in his handling of the car.
請注意冼拿由頭到尾都冇用個 "fast" 字!!!
明白出色的試車能力對工程/設計師們如何重要, 一定好重視, 但, 再強調多一次, 並非, 絕不會遷就車手來設計呀!!!!!!!!!!!
再引伸出, 又有出色試車能力, 又超快的車手, 值錢啊! 因為會有情況, 賽車在不同程度的高速度下的行為, 可能有頗大差異, 如果試車手唔夠超快, 是測唔出車架在極限時的行為, 是極 nervous 定 forgiving 呢???
調卞田的問題, 好清楚了, 是可駕馭性極難揸 ( drivability ) , 而不是車架 chassis balance 的問題!!! 即是引擎輸出/電子控制的太特發性, 你看不看到, 就算尾段帶開成條街, 再第??號灣之間的短直路轉線時, 是出完左灣跟住要轉右灣, 在那段直路仔由右邊移去左邊, 中間時成架車都標一標, 圈圈如是, 可想像那強勁的馬力, 好難禁得好, 郁d都可能領野......是在直路喎! 所以不是頭尾平衡的車架問題囉!
即係唔關駕駛風格呀, 你可以話, 手油都關駕駛風格事嘅, 錦樣, 比油已經係賽車技術最最最容易掌握個路喎?
口水都乾了, 為乜? 只為講事實.
分享
