原帖由
獅象 於 2013-3-18 06:21 PM 發表
倍耐力是刻意這樣做的. 現在的情景正正是它樂意看見.
目的就是增加不可預測性 --> 增加策略變化 --> 增加取捨難度 --> 增加可觀性.
我相信亦得到FIA的默許
FIA最緊要係收視率 = 電視轉播收益 ...
自己覆返自己?
係再覆返個題目至真 : Pure racing 原教旨主義 ???
派拉利胎的持久性又再成為上海站的頭條.
我相信不是專業賽車記者不懂. 只是今時今日太多傳媒追逐太少的**真**新聞
唔製造d議題出黎, 點出糧呀?! 搵食姐.
又唔好一竹篙打一船人.
看看以下一段.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/22145394
其中入題的是這段:-
".....Complaints that the current Pirelli tyres are creating a shadow-race.......The thought that drivers are not pushing to the limit in a sport that is meant to be the ultimate test of man and machine has led to some disquiet. "
其中批評最多的當然係紅牛車手及管理層啦, 點解?
"....Red Bull, though, have a vested interest. They believe they have a superior car that is being held back by the tyres. "
咁解囉
跟住再深入d睇吓
"........And the difficulty with any argument that claims the pace of the cars is dictated solely by tyres is that there are differences in speed between drivers in the same car (see Raikkonen and Romain Grosjean, for example, or Alonso and Massa) and also between different cars - the Ferrari was faster than Lotus, which was faster than the Mercedes and so on."
重點黎嘞
好簡單, 搵個 "過來人" 講事實姐.
"...... Some hark back to the 'tyre-war' era of the late 1990s and early 2000s as an example of drivers being able to push to the limit throughout, but those who were there say that isn't the case either.
Raikkonen said: "If you take six or 10 years ago still you could not always push 100%. It's normal. These tyres are very good in qualifying with grip and in some places you have to look after them a little bit more than others, but it's not any different from last year so I don't really understand why people are complaining so much." <------
嘩! Kimi, 唔好踢咁爆啦! .........之不過
我都要提醒, Kimi 的Lotus E21 (舊年的E20也一樣) 是最養胎的車架. 所以他算是 "既得利益者"
但講得有力完全因為講事實姐.
分享
