原帖由
毛毛68 於 2012-5-26 12:37 PM 發表
呢張圖纸一定准確
唔知ga!不過就有呢段英文解說.
...
I (Rob) started with a sketch that was continuously updated to the drawing on the left. Things proved to be far more complex then thought at first sight. This because altering just one dimension in the mechanics meant reconstructing the lot.
There are only a few known dimensions to work from, the rest had to be obtained by logic and comparing the pictures.
The resulting drawing shows a realistic Vorpanzer of which the mechanics would actually work.
Please keep in mind that these dimensions may not be 100% accurate, whilst there are also small differences with Liejon's model.
The images of the shooting range Tigers are in more ways confusing: Both show a marking that the driver's front plate is placed at an angle of 82°, whilst according to DW to Tiger 1, Henschel mentions this plate to be placed at an angle of 81°.
Also the first picture mentions the glacis plate to be at 11° whilst the other mentions 12°. To confuse things even more, I (others also) have measured it to be at 10°.
Until definite proof comes up for these dimensions, I stick to 10° for the glacis plate and 81° for the driver's front plate....
[
本帖最後由 戰斧 於 2012-5-26 12:44 PM 編輯 ]
分享
