其實好少事,年青人Vettel心急想贏,叫做上一堂,但如果這份鬥心都無,可以返屋企架喇,老舒要贏的時候咪又係咁,7次WC

即刻有人UP左上YOUTUBE
原來係後軚磨到
但好似唔知邊個無啦啦慢左之後搞到依件事出黎
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZUsafUQGNA

你個咸仔fans,開心晒喇,咸仔這場發揮得好好,但我保持一向立場,除Mclaren和Ferrari,我隊隊都支持

[ 本帖最後由 winstonm3bmw 於 2010-5-30 10:08 PM 編輯 ]

你原來唔識我喎!!!
我從來唔做擁躉/粉絲  越做擁躉/粉絲只會越自欺欺人!!!!!
我只追隨事實. 咸仔頭腦發熱時我都成日鬧!  佢做得好, 為乜因為佢效力邊隊而唔支持呢?!?!?!

我都無係特別係邊個擁躉/粉絲(要係的話, 第一係Prost, 第二係Senna), 但你知我架, 大隊我從來唔支持.

我就覺得唔係有冇鬥心問題, 而係判斷力問題
你又唔見阿朗, 咸仔及老舒咁多年來的 competitive 扒頭扒到炒呢??? ( 咳咳...老舒果兩次 94,97年的扒炒是故意的, 你明嘅 ) 就睇睇今站為例, 咸仔首圈翻扒 Vettel 有冇"掂"吖? 畢頓當係因為是隊友唔計喇!!! 阿朗外灣扒拍度夫 just make!!!

好明顯係 Vettel "捱右" 想食位攞返闊d條線而出事. 老實唔客氣, 係on居!!!!

頭七站埋一埋單先


Pos  Driver             Team                 Points
1    Mark Webber        RBR-Renault          93
2    Jenson Button      McLaren-Mercedes     88
3    Lewis Hamilton     McLaren-Mercedes     84
4    Fernando Alonso    Ferrari              79
5    Sebastian Vettel   RBR-Renault          78
6    Robert Kubica      Renault              67
7    Felipe Massa       Ferrari              67
8    Nico Rosberg       Mercedes GP          66
9    Michael Schumacher Mercedes GP          34
10   Adrian Sutil       Force India-Mercedes 22
11   Vitantonio Liuzzi  Force India-Mercedes 10
12   Rubens Barrichello Williams-Cosworth    7
13   Vitaly Petrov      Renault              6
14   Jaime Alguersuari  STR-Ferrari          3
15   Sebastien Buemi    STR-Ferrari          1
16   Kamui Kobayashi    BMW Sauber-Ferrari   1
17   Nico Hulkenberg    Williams-Cosworth    1
18   Pedro de la Rosa   BMW Sauber-Ferrari   0
19   Heikki Kovalainen  Lotus-Cosworth       0
20   Karun Chandhok     HRT-Cosworth         0
21   Lucas di Grassi    Virgin-Cosworth      0
22   Jarno Trulli       Lotus-Cosworth       0
23   Bruno Senna        HRT-Cosworth         0
24   Timo Glock         Virgin-Cosworth      0


Pos  Team                 Points
1    McLaren-Mercedes     172
2    RBR-Renault          171
3    Ferrari              146
4    Mercedes GP          100
5    Renault              73
6    Force India-Mercedes 32
7    Williams-Cosworth    8
8    STR-Ferrari          4
9    BMW Sauber-Ferrari   1
10   Lotus-Cosworth       0
11   HRT-Cosworth         0
12   Virgin-Cosworth      0

咸美頓今季場場都跑得好好, 場場都有好表現, 但多場都冇分....唔係爆軚就呢樣果樣...其實好登佢唔抵.....
今場「再一次」全程著晒, 串步不離咁死追class of its own既RB6, 足証架車一交到貨佢就可以deliver 表現！(畢頓都係)
最可惜今場兩個team radio令尾段「少左應有更精彩」既銀色內鬥.......咸美頓表現出意猶未盡及極之無奈無引既心情....而畢頓則表現出以大局為重及極之「識 lo」既車品....
冇計....「前車」可鑑.....剛剛眼前先 RB-1-2自炒, 如果再MP-1-2自炒, 返到去真係俾人丙獲金都似.....而且咸美頓同畢頓都同時間好需要呢D分數, 就算本身好想CHER盡D都好, 一個半個彎都叫做盡過力喇....... 呢個情況雖然以睇車既角度有D可惜同無奈, 但對車手來講以大局為重, 以全年總成績為重更重要..... 不過以咸美頓贏左車JIL都唔笑既表現, 真係唔知佢係覺得冇得「鬥贏」RB6s唔分氣多d, 一或係「唔俾」同畢頓鬥唔分氣多d.......

韋伯今場睇佢press conference時睇到佢好似想喊......本來vettel係後面頂鬼住兩架mp4係有好大機會rb-1-2....想loud鬼vettel但又唔可以係press con 「亂講」.....佢果幾個「yes.....yes.....yes....umum...」真係....唉................................都係果句, 畢頓同韋伯都係車場老手, 面對可能會製造同隊內訌既時況都handle得十分之好... 畢頓好體面(行)咁做左個press con, 韋伯則「無聲勝有聲」.... 家下分又多過vettel, 唔怕車隊俾壓力, 二來又可以爭取車迷支持, 高！

對丫,事情已經發生左,唔出聲真係最好,

咸仔賽後的神情及身體語言, 由其是入 parc ferme 泊好車離開 cockpit 時. 加上過完格仔旗在 radio 的"沈默" <---- 以往定必 vee 嘩鬼叫家嘛  我巳估到7788 ((<--- 強烈要求加多一個知少少扮晒野的卡通表情!!!))

車手只要贏!!! 話知你執雞又好乜都好, 一定雀躍!!! 就以今屆為例 :- 巴林站阿朗執 Vettel 雞, 澳洲站畢頓執 Vettel 雞, 上海站畢頓執紅牛再執 Rosberg 的 double 雞......邊有黑面????
迫, 或等對手犯錯, 從來都係比賽的一部份. 即是說, 車手係沒有勝之不武這個想法的.

那麼咸他為乜唔開心? ( 又係我斷估權威出場嘞 ) 會否他覺得畀車隊某人 (決策階層) 出賣呢???

請回憶那段 radio : " save fuel........最後果句係 ***same to Jenson*** " <---- 咸仔收到這訊息
咸仔明顯收慢. 跟住, 畢頓又......重施執雞大法!!! 咸仔 "醒" 了. 最明顯係, 咸仔爬翻畢頓後的表現 : 盡油!!! 即拋甩畢頓成秒!!! 之後畢頓才收到 save fuel message !!!!!!!!

賽後的記招訪問, ".......But me and Jenson had a good little battle. He got me on the outside into turn 13 and then fortunately I was able to get him back into turn one and so that was definitely unexpected." 大家有冇留心最後果句 *** that was DEFINITELY      U N E X P E C T E D   ***

如果大家不太善忘的話, 2007年凶牙利站排位賽, 阿朗再坐一會事件, 始作俑者...... 其實就係咸仔及其 team crew (應該係其中的決策者才更準確) 的蕉皮大法 : "線"人  所以咸仔是最了解麥拿倫的公司文化, 佢對 "save fuel 建議" 產生懷疑...........理所當然的

黑面, 係畀隊 team 睇的!!!

又多一個角度睇, good point! 亦言之成理

Mclaren 最鐘意 Team Order !

support youy view

睇下,,攞獎個時各有心事..
面黑黑的...
獅象兄說得對..

拿拿拿, 你地話架咋! 我冇咁講呀!

冇大細超??? 絕對公平??? ........... 冇事冇幹, 或事情發展乎合心意時, 咪大大聲聲吹甚麼甚麼尊重體育精神囉 唔只我非常欽敬的朗丹尼斯係咁, 其他口口聲聲都咁清高的 咪又係咁!!!

即刻睇吓紅牛吖!

Webber 吞吞吐吐卒之都畀貼士記者 : " Webber told journalists that they should 'dig more' to find out what had really happened."

原來又係被勸說要 save fuel 先至在第40圈慢 Vettel 咁多!!! Chris Horner 畀記者追問, 晚上先至局住承認有咁嘅事.

Speaking in the Istanbul paddock on Sunday night, team principal Christian Horner said that he was finally aware of what had happened in the race.  <------ 嘩!!! 你係 Team PRINCIPAL 黎架!!!! 賽緊時連咁重要的細節竟然唔知!  唔係下話!?!?

好嘞, 聽聽奧地利人, 前 F-1 車手的.....高見 !!!!

Red Bull's motorsport advisor Helmut Marko insists that both its Formula 1 team's drivers are treated exactly the same....

Marko says Vettel was allowed to attack Webber because there was no option to back him off. Vettel was under such pressure from Hamilton and if such a situation comes up – you have to look after the team.

Marko reckons that Vettel was in the right    **???** to turn across the track **???**, even with Webber there, since the German had got his nose ahead.
喂喂呀大佬, 已佔先, 對, 係有優先權, 不過係指 ***入灣***有優先權呀! 唔係任你打橫行呀大哥!!!! 果個係左灣, Vettel 根本已食左條內線呀!!! 向右移, 為乜??? 最精彩的高見, 在下面.

"He [Vettel] was already ahead, at least two metres ahead, and there was a corner to the left side coming, so he had to go for the line," he said. "He cannot brake on the dirt because for sure he knows what happens.

  呀 Marko 大佬, 個個車手都明知條窄線係咁環境架啦, 仲唔收插入去? 我代答啦: 唔係咁, 點會灣前佔先呢??? 係咪!?!? 咁樣咪就係要睇你有幾多斤兩, 在這嚴峻環境都可成功過灣囉!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Marko 大佬, 不如叫 Webber 即時彈開, 穩陣d計, 仲要問吓 Vettel : 夠唔夠闊呀條線 !!!

咁樣叫公平比賽??? 怒我理解能力低嘞 記得上一站摩納哥阿朗開頭過6架慢車事件嗎! 人人都話 : 賽車黎呀, 點解你怏過我就要讓呀?!  

唔......可能係我唔識亂up喎? 聽吓其他人點睇吖

Both Horner and Marko seemed to blame Webber for the crash, *** directly contradicting many experts within the paddock.***

我英文差, 請問以上一句點解呀?

It is rumoured that, as the pair were on equal points at the head of the world championship at the time of the shunt, Red Bull wanted Vettel to pass Webber and win the race.

Webber, 快d學德文啦! 或者入藉奧地利....德國都一樣得架! 二戰的德國元首希先生咪又係奧地利人!

咁, 咸仔果邊呢? 佢都係英國人黎個喎?


但佢唔係 anglo saxon 吖嘛

我快過網站啦!
其實我的所有前 kart 友都一早估到係果 D野架喇, 我只是"恰"你地係模型友姐

Hamilton unhappy after save fuel "instruction"
http://www.f1complete.com/2010-n ... e-fuel-instructions

不過我好懷疑畢頓的.....收左慳油指示後都去爬頭??? 睇左畢先生你十年喇, 你係乜性格大家好清楚, 你好識撈, 保老細...有前途呀!

又多d料喇!!!

BBC commentator Martin Brundle concluded that the young German was "unquestionably" at fault
車, 得佢咁諗姐......係咩???

.....I have to say that I read the incident the same way as Martin Brundle and David Coulthard did during the race - and Lewis Hamilton, Anthony Davidson and Alexander Wurz agreed afterwards.....

仲有仲有

.....As Button let slip in a BBC interview after the race, it turns out that he had been asked to turn his engine down three laps later than Hamilton had.

Hamilton, Button and team boss Martin Whitmarsh all played down any suggestions of trouble after the race, with Whitmarsh insisting "we didn't call off the fight".....

喂, d料係邊度黎架?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/andre ... attle_beginnin.html

呵呵, 你唔記得有1次 KOV 扮入 Pit 比 Ham 過咩 ?! Ham 過完後, KOV 又唔入呀, 得兩個 Possibilities

1. KOV 手車屎過我, 所以入唔切 Pit, 要紐番出尼
2. Team Order

馬田賓度果篇剛剛發表左　：－

Red Bull facing a civil war
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/ ... ula_one/8714410.stm

馬田對麥記的蕉皮門　都有落墨。我反為對佢描述咸仔的翻爬更有興趣，　是寫在最尾果段。：－

As Button squeezed Hamilton towards the pit wall the dust and discarded carbon-fibre was visibly being kicked up, we were all thinking: "How is Hamilton going to slow down enough with dirty tyres from an impossibly tight angle into the blind Turn One?"
Obviously Button was thinking the same and left him some space, otherwise Webber was about to inherit the lead once more.


我再嚴正聲明，　我不是任何人的粉絲 　講到爬頭，拿拿拿，　我淨係指ｃｏｍｐｅｔｉｔｉｖｅ爬頭咋 　

咸仔的，　我個人覺得，　不單只是現今所有車手之中最好，　由我真正懂得睇賽車以來，　咸仔的爬頭拍得住冼拿。　冼拿和咸仔，　至現時為止，　是我心目中的爬頭王

其實睇多幾次條片, 就會發覺 VETTEL 同 WEBBER 都無"轉""車太", 咁點解會撞? 好明顯係有人唔夠位過都死要過囉.....
我都好同意 HAMILTON 係當今過既爬頭王! 仲記唔記得季初有一場 HAMILTON 係十幾位 START, 但頭幾個圈已經過左好多人, 依 D咪天才般的實力囉, 改善埋季尾發神經既缺點就最好啦~